I'm a real supporter on the H4831 powder. I get fantastic velocity and accuracy outside of any caliber I have experimented with it in. From the twenty five-06 up for the 338 it is actually my head to powder of alternative. I attempt all kinds of powders when Doing work up loads, but the H4831 often appears to occur out on leading for precision and velocity when the case is in the 06 course or much larger.
They've performed identically for me. Like Everybody else I rushed to obtain the newer SC Edition but have now switched back. Ideally you would like about 100% loading density. For those who have enough scenario capacity for the H4831(lengthy) you might be possibly greater off.
It truly is possible that no additional dialogue is required, during which scenario we endorse beginning a whole new thread. If having said that you are feeling your reaction is necessary you could still accomplish that.
I have experienced a number of rifles that fouled definitely bad. Receiving many of the copper out was a real PIA right up until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
IMR powders also preform very well for me with a single notable exception. The many chrongraphing I've accomplished with them indicates the velecity is consistant higher than 32 degrees but begins to range once the temp begins to drop. The closer to zero I get the greater they differ. I've noticed about 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 in the Winter season time all around right here. Haven't noticed this with a lot of the other powders.
Liberalism; The impossible nonetheless recognized notion that it's fully attainable to pick up a turd by the clear finish.
Everyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the final results, any data it is possible to share? Should also point out I've some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I would like to exam out, When you've got details on that at the same time.
The SC or SSC specified powders Usually allow for higher load density, to help you commonly get a tad a lot more powder inside a given situation when working with compressed loads. Utilization of a fall tube can additional increase this edge.
WA I'd personally advocate a slower burner that could give greater situation density like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you might be loading heavies very long.
[e mail shielded] gn and 115 CT's, I have killed far more Deer using this type of combo than each of the rifles I individual combined, Do the job as much as this although the sweet location will likely be all around fifty four, I'm a Two Bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat performs very well for me When your interested
Operate your load h4831sc up with the precise powder (sc or typical) and great deal you will be applying however. Exact same melt away fee doesn't mean it will behave "exactly" the same. I have witnessed in excess of 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp numerous H4831.
It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six 5 shot group right now. It can be a bit slower than H1000, but shoots excellent. Many thanks for the recommendation, it's great to realize that I have bought options when a single or the opposite powder h4831sc is dried up.
The two contain the Identical melt away price, shorter Lower is available in useful if you are at max fill and never at tension/velocity that you would like you can obtain much more shortcut in a very h4831sc load data circumstance.
I sawed a person in 50 % to check out how thick the jackets were being, plus they ended up simply two times as thick like a 50-grain hollow point was. Ditto with the sixty four-grain Electricity Level, as these bullets are developed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every thing I understand about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know something at all in regards to the 223. I doubt that you are going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.